不同健康状态的棘胸蛙肠道菌群结构分析

ANALYSIS OF INTESTINAL MICROBIOTA STRUCTURE IN DIFFERENT HEALTH CONDITIONS OF PAA SPINOSA

  • 摘要: 为探究不同健康状态下棘胸蛙(Paa spinosa, David)肠道菌群结构, 文章对13个健康(Health组)、19个患歪头病(WHD组)和18个患蓝眼病(BED组)的棘胸蛙肠道微生物总DNA进行16S rRNA V4—V5高变区测序。结果显示: 共获得3984个总操作分类单元(Operational taxonomic units, OTUs), 35个门, 80个纲, 155个目, 283个科, 501个属。α多样性结果表明, 健康组的菌群丰富度显著高于患病组(P<0.05), 患病组间的菌群丰富度差异不显著(Chao1指数: Health: 1232.92; WHD: 975.57; BED: 1048.76); 健康和患病组间微生物群落均匀度无显著差异(Shannon指数: 5.27; 5.20; 5.41)。门分类水平分析发现: 厚壁菌门(Firmicutes; 52.08%; 49.57%; 26.48%)、拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes; 30.55%; 21.93%; 43.02%)和变形菌门(Proteobacteria; 15.55%;10.42%; 5.25%)是棘胸蛙肠道菌群的优势菌门。患病蛙肠道中的优势菌门及其丰度均发生变化, 特别是脱铁菌门(Deferribacteres)在歪头病组和蓝眼病组棘胸蛙肠道中丰度显著上升(0.18%; 14.05%; 22.16%; P<0.05)。属分类水平分析发现: 拟杆菌属(Bacteroides; 29.70%; 16.09%; 21.76%)、丹毒丝菌科中未定义的一个属(An unclassified Erysipelotrichaceae; 21.38%; 6.92%; 4.94%)、毛螺科中未定义的一个属(An unclassified Lachnospiraceae; 12.23%; 15.98%; 4.43%)、柠檬杆菌属(Citrobacter; 10.31%; 6.19%; 1.10%)和真杆菌属(Eubacterium; 9.09%; 4.88%; 0.54%) 是棘胸蛙肠道菌群优势菌属, 但各组间的丰度差异显著; 脱铁菌门的Mucispirillum在患病棘胸蛙肠道中丰度显著上升(0.17%; 13.89%; 21.94% ; P<0.05)。研究表明: 棘胸蛙肠道菌群结构与健康状态相关, 且健康与患病棘胸蛙肠道菌群结构差异显著。

     

    Abstract: Paa spinosa is an important amphibious economic animal distributed in the rolling mountains in the south of China. In the process of artificial farming, diseases have become an important factor on its yield reduction. Intestinal microbiota is considered to be involved in organism’s immune response. However, it is unclear whether the composition and diversity of intestinal microbiota are related to the health condition of P. spinosa. To explore the structure of intestinal flora of P. spinosa under different health conditions, 13 healthy (Health), 19 wonky-head disease (WHD) and 18 blue-eye disease (BED) P. spinosa were sampled. Total intestinal DNA were extracted following manufacture’s procedures, and V4-V5 region of 16S rRNA were amplified and sequenced using Illumina Miseq sequencing platform. A total of 3984 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were obtained, belonging to 35 phyla, 80 classes, 155 orders, 283 families, and 501 genera. The results showed that the microbiota abundance of the healthy group was significantly higher than that of the sick groups with no significant difference between group WHD and BED (Chao1 index: Health: 1232.92; WHD: 975.57; BED: 1048.76), and the microbial community diversity exhibited no significant difference between healthy and sick groups (Shannon index: 5.27; 5.20; 5.41). The dominant bacterial phyla included Firmicutes (52.08%; 49.57%; 26.48%), Bacteroidetes (30.55%; 21.93%; 43.02%) and Proteobacteria (15.55%; 10.42%; 5.25%). As a consequence, Deferribacteres increased significantly in sick groups (0.18%; 14.05%; 22.16%). The dominant bacterial genera included Bacteroides (29.70%; 16.09%; 21.76%), an unclassified Erysipelotrichaceae (21.38%; 6.92%; 4.94%), an unclassified Lachnospiraceae (12.23%; 15.98%; 4.43%), Citrobacter (10.31%; 6.19%; 1.10%) and Eubacterium (9.09%; 4.88%; 0.54%). Mucispirillum (0.17; 13.89%; 21.94%) of Deferribacteres increased significantly in sick groups. The analysis of Beta diversity showed that samples from healthy and sick groups were clustered separately. These results reveal that the structure and diversity of intestinal microbiota were related to the health conditions of P. spinosa. This study provides reliable data and theoretical guidance for the subsequent improvement of the production and quality of P. spinosa, and the selection of intestinal probiotics and the study of probiotic preparations.

     

/

返回文章
返回